| Subject of Assessment and Grades | Grade Definitions | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Green Finance | Social Finance | Sustainable Finance | |
| G1 | S1 | ST1 |
A high portion of the proceeds are used for eligible project, process for project evaluation and selection, |
| G2 | S2 | ST2 |
A high portion of the proceeds are used for eligible project, process for project evaluation and selection, |
| G3 | S3 | ST3 |
A higher-than-moderate portion of the proceeds are used for eligible project, process for project evaluation and selection, |
| G4 | S4 | ST4 |
A moderate portion of the proceeds are used for eligible project, process for project evaluation and selection, |
| G5 | S5 | ST5 |
A low portion of the proceeds are used for eligible project, process for project evaluation and selection, |
| Grades | Grade Definitions |
|---|---|
| Excellent |
KPIs are critical to improve sustainability of the issuer and the 스네이크 카지노 of ambition of the SPTs is very high. |
| Good |
KPIs are important to improve sustainability of the issuer and the 스네이크 카지노 of ambition of the SPTs is high. |
| Fair |
KPIs contribute to improvement of sustainability of the issuer and the 스네이크 카지노 of ambition of the SPTs is fair. |
| Grades | Grade Definitions |
|---|---|
| Excellent |
The issuer’s climate transition strategy has a very high 스네이크 카지노 of appropriateness, systematicity, transparency and environmental materiality in business activities |
| Good |
The issuer’s climate transition strategy has a high 스네이크 카지노 of appropriateness, systematicity, transparency and environmental materiality in business activities |
| Fair |
The issuer’s climate transition strategy has a fair 스네이크 카지노 of appropriateness, systematicity, transparency and environmental materiality in business activities |